In a thrilling turn of events at the Formula E Mexico City E-Prix, Nick Cassidy secured a stunning victory for Citroen, marking the brand's first win in only its second race. But here's where it gets controversial... While Cassidy's strategic prowess and brilliant energy-saving tactics were undoubtedly key to his success, some argue that the race's outcome was more about the luck of the draw than sheer skill. And this is the part most people miss... The race began with Taylor Barnard taking the lead, but a series of yellow flags and safety car periods, including one due to Nyck de Vries' mechanical issue and another after Antonio Felix da Costa's collision with Maximilian Gunther, played a significant role in Cassidy's recovery. These moments, some argue, were more about the unpredictability of the race than Cassidy's strategic brilliance. Despite this, Cassidy's win is undoubtedly a remarkable achievement, and it's hard to deny the impact of his energy-saving tactics and Attack Mode usage. But the question remains: was it sheer luck or strategic genius that led to Citroen's first Formula E victory? And this is where the debate begins... We want to hear from you! Do you think Cassidy's win was more about luck or strategy? Share your thoughts in the comments below and let's discuss!
